Development and content validation of the Clinician-reported Genetic testing Utility InDEx for genomic newborn screening (C-GUIDE NBS)

Read full text
Authors: Salma Shickh, Stephanie Luca, Katharine Fooks, Elise Poole, Bowen Xiao, Joyce Yan, Amanda Pichini, Joanna Ziff, K. D. Stone, Wendy J. Ungar, Pranesh Chakraborty, David Bick
+1 more Robin Z. Hayeems
Cited by: 1
References: 34

Abstract

PURPOSE: Genomic newborn screening (gNBS) is emerging worldwide. Evidence of clinical utility, acceptability, and performance is required to guide policy and funding decisions. We aimed to develop a tool called C-GUIDE NBS, adapted from the Clinician-reported Genetic testing Utility InDEx (C-GUIDE), to quantify the clinical utility of gNBS for diagnostic testing. METHODS: We drafted an initial version of the tool by identifying relevant domains and modifying existing C-GUIDE items. Interviews were conducted with clinicians involved in gNBS to assess item relevance, comprehensibility, and comprehensiveness. We quantified the number of items that clinicians accepted, modified, or rejected and synthesized qualitative feedback to inform a revised version. These participants also completed content validity questionnaires to rate the relevance and clarity of each item using a 4-point Likert scale. The relevance and clarity scores were calculated between 0 and 1. Then, we refined C-GUIDE NBS using a 3-step international Delphi consensus process. RESULTS: In the cognitive interviews, participants (N = 22) indicated that 8 of the preliminary 11 items were acceptable for inclusion as is; 2 items required modifications, and 1 was rejected. On the revised 10-item tool, item relevance and clarity scores

Fields of Study & Subjects

Genomics and Rare Diseases Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics BRCA gene mutations in cancer

Publication details

Journal / source
Genetics in Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Volume
28
Issue
8
Pages
102611–102611
Publication date
26 May 2026
Language
EN