Ecological risk of diethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP) and non-phthalate plasticizers in Osaka Bay - Japan and in rivers of Yogyakarta - Indonesia

● This is the first study on toxics of NPPs to benthic organisms. ● The ecotoxicity tests in this study provided PNEC for the first time for some NPPs. ● Presently, NPPs do not appear to pose a major concern to aquatic organisms. ● DEHP have medium to high ecological risks in both fresh and sea- waters. Non-phthalate plasticizers (NPPs) are increasingly used as alternative plasticizers without any clear understanding of the associated ecological risk. Therfore, this study aims to evaluate those for diethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP) and NPPs (diisobutyl adipate (DIBA), acetyl tributyl citrate (ATBC), di-(2-ethylhexyl) adipate (DEHA), di-(2-ethylhexyl) sebacate (DEHS) and trioctyl trimellitate (TOTM)) in Osaka Bay, Japan and in the Opak and Code rivers (Indonesia). Risks were assessed using a risk quotient (RQ), by comparing the residual concentration with the predicted no-effect concentration (PNEC). PNECs were derived from toxicity values on fresh/marine water organisms. Residual concentrations were quantified in seawater from Osaka Bay, and in freshwater and sediment from the Indonesian rivers. This provides the first toxicity data for NPPs on marine organisms, with macroalgae being the most sensitive. There were no-observed-effect concentration (NOEC) of 0.5 mg/L for DIBA and 1.0 mg/L for DEHA, DEHS, and TOTM. Within NPPs, only ATBC showed toxic for worm (NOEC: 60mg/kg). In Indonesian river sediment, relatively high concentrations of DEHA and DEHS (241 and 229 ng/g, respectively) were observed, suggesting temporary contamination. Recorded NPPs concentration in Indonesian river water were lower than those in Osaka Bay. The high values of Osaka Bay are arguably due to small factories’ wastewaters. DEHA and TOTM presented low ecological risks (RQ