Risk of acute myocardial infarction with ticagrelor, prasugrel, and clopidogrel prescription after coronary stent restenosis: A retrospective real-world comparative risk analysis with TriNetX

Read full text
Authors: Yesh Dhruva, Akhil V Kumar, Atman K. Shah, Rohit B. Ponnada, Nicholas Mootz, Ching-Hsien Lu, Venkata Praneeth Peddada, Chien-Jung Lin
Cited by: 0
References: 12

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Coronary stent restenosis remains a clinically significant challenge, often resulting in recurrent myocardial infarction (MI). Optimal antiplatelet therapy following restenosis is unclear, as most comparative studies were conducted in broader acute coronary syndrome populations. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using TriNetX to identify patients with in-stent restenosis (ICD-10: T82.855) who were subsequently prescribed clopidogrel, prasugrel, or ticagrelor. The primary outcome was acute MI (ICD-10: I21) within one year of prescription. Adjusted Cox proportional hazards models compared MI risk between agents, controlling for age, sex, HbA1c, heart failure, CKD, cerebrovascular disease, and mortality. RESULTS: Among 40,206 patients, MI occurred in 22.5% of prasugrel users (n=1,139), 29.0% of clopidogrel users (n=35,071), and 35.9% of ticagrelor users (n=4,041). Compared to clopidogrel, ticagrelor was associated with significantly increased MI risk (HR 1.552; 95% CI: 1.467-1.642; p

Fields of Study & Subjects

Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics Acute Myocardial Infarction Research

Publication details

Journal / source
Heart & Lung
Volume
78
Pages
102752–102752
Publication date
1 March 2026
Language
EN