Long-Term Outcomes of Stereotactic MRI-Guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy (SMART) for Prostate Cancer: Results From a Real-World Large Patient Cohort

Read full text
Authors: Claire van Vliet, S. Tetar, Omar Bohoudi, Paul Cobussen, Lisette M. van Maurik, Philip Meijnen, R. Jeroen A. van Moorselaar, Miguel A. Palacios, Anna H.M. Piet, Peter S.N. van Rossum, Eva Versteijne, Ben J. Slotman
+1 more Anna M E Bruynzeel
Cited by: 0
References: 22

Abstract

PURPOSE: Stereotactic magnetic resonance imaging-guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) has emerged as a treatment for localized prostate cancer with excellent acute toxicity outcomes. However, long-term outcomes have not been reported. This study reports on long-term outcomes of SMART for prostate cancer in a single institution. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We included consecutive patients with localized prostate cancer treated with SMART in an institutional prospective database comprising all risk categories. Treatment was delivered in 5 fractions of 7.25 Gy with daily online adaptation, preferably within 2 weeks. Acute and late toxicity as well as biochemical recurrences were routinely assessed during follow-up. Biochemical recurrence was defined by Phoenix criteria (prostate-specific antigen nadir + 2), and local, regional, or distant recurrence was confirmed by PSMA PET-CT imaging. RESULTS: From 2016-2021, 464 patients were analyzed. Median age was 72 years (range, 50-89) and the majority of patients had intermediate (50.0%) or high (44.8%) risk prostate cancer based on EAU guidelines. Acute gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity grade ≥2 rates were 5.2% and 19.8%, and cumulative late gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity grade ≥2 rates were 0.2% and 6.5%, respectively. After a median follow-up of 48.8 months (IQR, 36.3-63.5), 76 recurrences (16.4%) were recorded, most occurred in the high-risk group. Estimated 5-year freedom from biochemical or clinical failure for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk subgroups was 100% (95% CI, 100-100), 77.7% (95% CI, 68.2-84.7) and 74.9% (95% CI, 66.2-81.7), respectively. Incorporation of diagnostic imaging in tumor staging improved risk stratification and led to corresponding rates of 100% (95% CI, 100-100), 85.5% (95% CI, 76.6-91.2), and 71.6% (95% CI, 63.2-78.4). CONCLUSIONS: In this large cohort of patients with prostate cancer treated with SMART, acute and late toxicity was low. Biochemical and clinical control for high-risk patients was lower than for low- and intermediate-risk patients. Improved staging refines risk classification, guiding treatment intensification such as dose escalation in high-risk patients.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques Breast Cancer Treatment Studies

Publication details

Journal / source
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
Volume
125
Issue
4
Pages
1130–1139
Publication date
15 January 2026
Language
EN