Development of a National Indication Protocol for Proton Therapy in Patients With Seminoma Testis to Reduce the Risk on Subsequent Primary Cancers

Read full text
Authors: Nienke Kuijsters, Peter F. Sinnige, Pauline A. C. Bakker, Shafak Al Uwini, Charlotte L. Brouwer, Tom C.G. Budiharto, Robert Paul Coppes, Maarten L.P. Dirkx, Martine Franckena, Steven Habraken, Marianne A. A. de Jong, Yvonne L.B. Klaver
+9 more Johannes Albertus Langendijk, Ada Oele, Erik C. Schimmel, Ewoud Schuit, Robert Jan Smeenk, Mirko Unipan, Ben G. L. Vanneste, Wilma D. Heemsbergen, Liesbeth Jorinne Boersma
Cited by: 0
References: 33

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop a National Indication Protocol for Proton therapy (PT) (NIPP) for selecting seminoma testis patients (STPs) for PT in the Netherlands, aiming at reducing the risk of subsequent primary cancers (SPCs). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A multidisciplinary workgroup developed criteria for an NIPP based on a systematic literature search. To estimate its potential, PT-photon plan comparisons were constructed for 13 historical patients, after which NIPP version 1 was finalized. First clinical results of NIPP-v1 were evaluated. RESULTS: From cohort studies, it was established that the kidney, pancreas, stomach, and bladder were the main organs at risk contributing to excess SPC risks in STPs treated with radiation therapy. Estimated excess relative risks per 1 Gy increase in mean dose were as follows: kidney, 0.13; pancreas, 0.12; stomach, 0.47; and bladder, 0.50. Combined with absolute lifetime risks from the Dutch male population (age, 30-79 years), the corresponding lifetime absolute excess risks (AERs) per 1 Gy increase were +0.20%, +0.16%, +0.28%, and +0.65%, respectively. A first exploratory analysis in 13 replanned historical patients showed potential for an NIPP, as the required AER reduction of ≥2% for a grade 4 adverse event was achievable in 11 cases (85%). In a provisional NIPP version 1, criteria were as follows: age ≤50 years; paraortic and/or para-iliac RT; and no life-threatening comorbidity. In NIPP version 2 (approved and implemented), an estimated lifetime AER reduction of ≥2% by PT was required as well. From the first 76 PT patients based on NIPP-v1, 71% would qualify for NIPP-v2 as well. In 39 available PT-photon comparisons, we found an average 3.0% (median, 2.9%; IQR, 2.1%) AER reduction by PT. CONCLUSIONS: We defined an NIPP for the selection of STPs for PT in the Netherlands, aimed to reduce the risk of SPC. According to this NIPP, about 75% of these patients qualify for PT. Further studies are required to allow inclusion of nononcological late effects as selection criteria in the NIPP.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques Multiple and Secondary Primary Cancers

Publication details

Journal / source
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
Volume
126
Issue
4
Pages
1345–1353
Publication date
15 February 2026
Language
EN