Engagement of people with lived experience in the design and development of digital mental health interventions: A scoping review of engagement characteristics and impacts

Read full text
Authors: Alana Fisher, Noni Jervis, Madelyne A. Bisby, Milena Gandy, Andreea I. Heriseanu, Taylor Hathway, Atria Rezwan, Nickolai Titov, Blake F. Dear
Cited by: 2
References: 62

Abstract

Digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) aim to increase access to mental healthcare for people who would otherwise not access it. Accordingly, the design and development of DMHIs may particularly benefit from engaging people with lived experience (PwLE). A scoping review involving systematic database searches identified and synthesised original research reporting PwLE engagement in the design and development of DMHIs (published January 2000– April 2024). Articles were independently title/abstract screened by two authors, and full-text screened by one author. Included article data were extracted, independently checked, and descriptively synthesised. Twenty-nine studies were included, published 2012–2024, in high-income countries. Engagement was mostly via ‘consultation’ level activities (e.g., focus groups), followed by ‘involvement’ or ‘collaboration’. In almost half of studies, engagement spanned multiple engagement levels across the different development stages. Reported impacts included changes to content, design, and delivery (e.g., revised language). Authors credited engagement with improved DMHI relevance, acceptability, and inclusivity, while noted challenges include limited diversity among engaged PwLE and resource demands. For reported DMHI outcomes, studies reported positive findings related to use, and attitudes towards using DMHIs. However, reported findings were more mixed for mental health outcomes (e.g., symptom improvement). Additionally, it was not possible to directly link outcomes to PwLE engagement. Review findings highlight the increasing but predominantly consultative engagement of PwLE in developing DMHIs. Future research directions include more transparent and consistent reporting of engagement, deliberative decision-making around engagement levels/types, and more rigorous evaluation of engagement to investigate its association with DMHI outcomes. • Design of DMHIs may particularly benefit from engaging people with lived experience. • Scoping review synthesised 29 studies reporting PwLE engagement in DMHI development. • Engagement was mostly consultative; changes spanned DMHI design, content, delivery. • Benefits were commonly reported, but direct links to DMHI outcomes remain unclear. • More detailed reporting and rigorous evaluation of engagement in DMHI research needed.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Digital Mental Health Interventions Mental Health and Patient Involvement Innovative Human-Technology Interaction

Publication details

Journal / source
Internet Interventions
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Volume
43
Pages
100914–100914
Publication date
29 January 2026
Language
EN