Varenicline and Ventricular Ectopy After Myocardial Infarction

Read full text
Authors: Yunli Shen, Xiaogang Guo, Xiaogang Guo, Chunyu Zeng, Dao Wen Wang, Wei Han, Xiang Cheng, Xinyang Hu, Duanyang Xie, Yi Liu, Dandan Liang, Ran Duan
+24 more Bing Yang, Qi Zhang, Hongxia Li, Baowei Zhang, Guozhe Sun, Nanxiang Ouyang, Xiaofan Guo, Xiaofan Guo, Shu Zhang, Bingqing Zhou, Liang Zheng, Shenglin Liu, Ke Xiong, Guanghua Wang, Qicheng Zou, Beihua Shao, Zhiwen Chen, Kang Wang, Xiaotong Wang, Fei Han, Yahan Wu, Zongzhe Li, Yingxian Sun, Yihan Chen
Cited by: 1
References: 25

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Conventional antiarrhythmic drugs that target cardiac ion channels carry proarrhythmic risks, highlighting the need for alternative therapeutic approaches. Cardiac nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) represent a novel electrophysiological target. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this exploratory, proof-of-concept phase 2 trial was to evaluate the effect of varenicline, a partial nAChR agonist, on frequent premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) after myocardial infarction (MI) and to assess its short-term safety and biological target engagement. METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, adults with frequent PVCs (≥1,000/24 h) assessed using 72-hour ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring at ≥4 weeks post-MI were randomly assigned (1:1) to varenicline 0.5 mg twice daily or matching placebo for 45 days, in addition to guideline-directed medical therapy. The primary endpoint was the percentage change in 24-hour PVC count from baseline to week 6. Key secondary endpoints included responder rate (≥50% reduction in PVC count) and the incidence of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (VT). RESULTS: Among 118 randomized patients, varenicline produced a 60.1 percentage point greater reduction in PVC burden compared with placebo (95% CI: 21.3-98.8 percentage points; P = 0.001). The responder rate was higher with varenicline (67.8% vs 30.5%; RR: 2.22; 95% CI: 1.46-3.39; P < 0.0001), and nonsustained VT incidence was lower (20.3% vs 37.3%; RR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.29-0.85; P = 0.007). No deaths or malignant ventricular arrhythmias occurred in the varenicline group, with comparable adverse event rates between groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this phase 2 trial, varenicline significantly reduced PVC burden and nonsustained VT incidence in post-MI patients without evidence of a proarrhythmic effects. These findings support cardiac nAChRs as a potential antiarrhythmic target and justify further evaluation in larger outcome-driven trials. (Efficacy of Varenicline Tartrate in Treating Frequent Premature Ventricular Contractions: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial [Var-PVC]; NCT06780215).

Fields of Study & Subjects

Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments Cardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy

Publication details

Journal / source
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Volume
88
Issue
2
Pages
170–184
Publication date
4 March 2026
Language
EN