Macrolides for asthma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

Read full text
Authors: Leonardo M. Ologundudu, Melanie M. Wong, Nazmul Islam, Daniel G. Rayner, A. Chu, Mark Loeb, Katherine Rivera-Spoljaric, Bradley Chipps, Kaharu Sumino, John Oppenheimer, Sharmilee M. Nyenhuis, Elliot Israel
+18 more Flavia Hoyte, Tamara T. Perry, Ellen McCabe, Valerie G. Press, Susana Rangel, Gordon H. Guyatt, Lindsay E. Shade, Paul M. O’Byrne, Hilarry Orr, Dia Sue-Wah-Sing, Angel Melendez, Tonya Winders, Donna D Gardner, Kathyrn Przywara, Giselle Mosnaim, Leonard B. Bacharier, Matthew A. Rank, Derek Chu
Cited by: 2
References: 76

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The benefits and harms of using macrolides for asthma remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: As part of upcoming Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology/American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters guidelines addressing severe asthma, we systematically reviewed the efficacy and safety of macrolides for asthma. METHODS: We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL to April 12, 2025, for randomized trials comparing macrolides with placebo or standard care for asthma. Paired reviewers independently screened records and extracted data. Individual patient-level data in random effects analysis of covariance models addressed asthma control and asthma-related quality of life. Random effects meta-analyses addressed severe exacerbations and harms. We used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach to evaluate certainty of evidence. Our study protocol is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023408677). RESULTS: Our meta-analysis comprised 19 trials enrolling 1825 participants. Compared with placebo, macrolides improve asthma control (6-item Asthma Control Questionnaire; score range 0-6, lower better; between-group mean difference: -0.23 [95% CI -0.32 to -0.13]; 40.6% vs 21.6% improving by minimally important difference of 0.5 point; high certainty), likely reduce severe exacerbations (incidence rate ratio: 0.75 [95% CI 0.57 to 0.98]; rate difference: 0.26 fewer events per patient-year [95% CI 0.45 to 0.02 fewer events]; moderate certainty), and likely modestly improve quality of life (Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire; score range 1-7, higher better; mean difference: 0.11 [95% CI -0.06 to 0.29]; 47.6% vs 42.4% improving by minimally important difference of 0.5 points; moderate certainty) with little to no effect on serious adverse events and mortality (high certainty). Relative effects were similar among patients with type 2 high inflammation versus type 2 low inflammation asthma. CONCLUSIONS: Macrolides likely reduce severe exacerbations and improve asthma control and quality of life with little to no difference in serious harms among patients with type 2 high inflammation or type 2 low inflammation asthma.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Asthma and respiratory diseases Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery Delphi Technique in Research

Publication details

Journal / source
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Publication date
1 February 2026
Language
EN