IMPACT (Immune Monitoring and Phenotype Assessment of Clinical Trajectory) for Patients With Inborn Errors of Immunity From the Primary Immune Deficiency Treatment Consortium (PIDTC)

Read full text
Authors: Danielle E. Arnold, Hesham Eissa, Elizabeth Dunn, Geoffrey D.E. Cuvelier, Nicola A. M. Wright, Rebecca A. Marsh, Suhag Parikh, Blachy Davila Saldana, Mark T. Vander Lugt, Rosa Bacchetta, Lisa Forbes Satter, Shanmuganathan Chandrakasan
+17 more Erinn S. Kellner, Eric J. Allenspach, Erica G. Schmitt, Brent R. Logan, Lauri M. Burroughs, Morton Jerome Cowan, Linda M. Griffith, Luigi Notarangelo, Sung‐Yun Pai, Michael A. Pulsipher, Christopher C. Dvorak, Elie Haddad, Jennifer M. Puck, Troy R. Torgerson, Jennifer W. Leiding, Jennifer Heimall, Alice Y. Chan
Cited by: 1
References: 14

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evaluating natural history and outcomes of rare inborn errors of immunity (IEIs) has been challenging due to the diverse disease manifestations and lack of standardized data. OBJECTIVE: To develop a set of standardized, quantitative, generalizable data collection modules to measure organ dysfunction in IEIs, modeled on the previously validated Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event system for grading treatment toxicity. METHODS: Disease conditions were organized by organ system. Experts from the Primary Immune Deficiency Treatment Consortium identified essential features of severe combined immunodeficiency, chronic granulomatous disease, Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome, and primary immune regulatory disorders and compared these to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event conditions, adding and refining features as needed. Dates of onset and resolution, disease-specific laboratory values, and therapeutic interventions were also incorporated. Modules were reviewed by protocol teams, key stakeholders, clinical coordinators, and statisticians to improve feasibility and completeness. RESULTS: We developed a tool called IMPACT (Immune Monitoring and Phenotype Assessment of Clinical Trajectory) containing 15 modules assessing 196 disease conditions. A grading system from 1 to 5 (mild, moderate, severe, life-threatening, fatal) permits longitudinal tracking of disease condition severity. Outcomes of interventions can be measured quantitatively by comparing scores before and after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Standardized, quantitative assessment tools for IEIs can yield uniform data sets to illuminate their natural history and evaluate outcomes of interventions, not only to understand specific diseases but also to compare effects between disease entities. Tools, such as IMPACT, are essential for therapeutic trials for rare, complex multisystem diseases such as IEIs and other disorders with protean manifestations.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Immunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders Blood disorders and treatments Immune responses and vaccinations

Publication details

Journal / source
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology In Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Volume
14
Issue
8
Pages
1893–1900
Publication date
3 June 2026
Language
EN