Redo–Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With Self-Expanding Valves

Read full text
Authors: Toby Rogers, Vinayak Bapat, Stanley J. Chetcuti, Harold L. Dauerman, John K. Forrest, Sachin S. Goel, Kendra J. Grubb, Wah Wah Htun, Rishi Puri, Michael J. Reardon, Gilbert H.L. Tang, Amit N. Vora
+3 more Steven J. Yakubov, Ruth Eisenberg, Guilherme Attizzani
Cited by: 1
References: 8

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Redo-transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for failed transcatheter heart valves is expected to increase, but data on outcomes with self-expanding valves remain limited. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to evaluate procedural, clinical, and quality-of-life outcomes following redo-TAVR using self-expanding Evolut valves and to compare these outcomes with those among a contemporary native TAVR cohort. METHODS: Outcomes after redo-TAVR with Evolut R, Evolut PRO, and Evolut PRO+ valves in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology TVT (Transcatheter Valve Therapy) Registry were analyzed and compared with outcomes after native-valve TAVR using the same valve platform during the same study period. The primary endpoints were all-cause mortality, stroke, and readmission at 30 days and 1 year. RESULTS: Among 439 redo-TAVR patients (mean age 78.9 ± 9.8 years, 63.1% women), procedural complication rates were low. Redo-TAVR reduced transvalvular gradients at 1 year, although gradients remained modestly higher than after native TAVR (11.3 ± 6.1 mm Hg vs 8.2 ± 4.6 mm Hg; P < 0.001). After adjustment, clinical outcomes were similar between redo-TAVR and native TAVR at 30 days (mortality adjusted HR: 0.66 [95% CI: 0.39-1.13; P = 0.129]; stroke adjusted HR: 0.95 [95% CI: 0.54-1.68; P = 0.853]; readmission adjusted HR: 0.88 [95% CI: 0.65-1.20; P = 0.422]) and 1-year (mortality adjusted HR: 0.91 [95% CI: 0.72-1.15; P = 0.441]; stroke adjusted HR: 0.91 [95% CI: 0.63-1.34; P = 0.644]; readmission adjusted HR: 0.92 [95% CI: 0.76-1.13; P = 0.439]). Improvements in functional status and quality of life were observed early after redo-TAVR and were sustained through 1 year. Findings were consistent across prespecified subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: In a national registry, redo-TAVR with the Evolut platform was associated with low procedural complication rates and clinical outcomes comparable with those observed with native TAVR. These findings support redo-TAVR with Evolut as a feasible and effective treatment strategy in appropriately selected patients.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches

Publication details

Journal / source
JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Volume
19
Issue
16
Pages
2204–2216
Publication date
1 August 2026
Language
EN