AI-driven gingival segmentation on CBCT: Validation using delineation by intraoral scanning and CBCT-based cotton roll separation

Read full text
Authors: Fernanda Bulhões Fagundes, Dhanaporn Papasratorn, Bahaaeldeen M. Elgarba, Rocharles Cavalcante Fontenele, Frederico Sampaio Neves, Reinhilde Jacobs
Cited by: 3
References: 44

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To validate a novel AI approach for automated gingival segmentation directly from cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans acquired with cotton roll separation. METHODS: One hundred and eighty arches (101 CBCT) were split into: ground truth (90 arches), internal validation [AI vs manual segmentation (MS); 30 arches], and clinical validation [AI vs expert refinement (R-AI); 60 arches]. Ground truth consisted of manually segmented gingival models from CBCT with cotton roll separation, using intraoral scan outlines as references. AI gingival segmentation was generated from CBCT acquired with cotton roll separation, uploaded to a cloud-based platform (Virtual Patient Creator, Relu, Belgium). R-AI was performed by refining the AI segmentation according to CBCT outlines. The performance was evaluated using voxel-wise and surface-based comparisons. Additionally, time efficiency and consistency were evaluated. RESULTS: AI gingiva achieved high overlap with MS, with Dice score (DSC) of 80 ± 4 % and minor surface discrepancies, with median surface distance (MSD) of 0.02 ± 0.09 mm. Similarly, DSC between AI and R-AI was high (91 ± 4 %), and MSD was small (0.07 ± 0.07 mm). Significant differences between arches were found in AI vs R-AI; however, these differences were not clinically relevant (∆DSC∼2 %, ∆MSD∼0.00 mm, p < 0.05). Evaluator consistency was high, whereas AI achieved perfect reproducibility and significantly increased time efficiency (6.7 s) compared to R-AI (1090 s) and MS (4344 s), p < 0.001. CONCLUSION: The presently validated cloud-based AI model achieved fast, accurate, and consistent gingiva segmentation from CBCTs comparable to expert-level performance using CBCT-based cotton roll separation with delineation by intraoral scanning as a clinical reference. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Automated 3D gingival models may assist efficient diagnosis, treatment planning, and outcome visualization in esthetic dentistry, orthodontic treatment planning, and periodontal assessment. This approach has strong potential to transform digital dentistry workflows.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Dental Radiography and Imaging Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Publication details

Journal / source
Journal of Dentistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Volume
166
Pages
106331–106331
Publication date
5 January 2026
Language
EN