Comparison of extraction methods and internal standards for the determination of benzo[a]pyrene in foods using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

Read full text
Authors: Adebayo J. Akinboye, Natalia M. Oliden Antezana, Kiyun Kim, Minju Koo, Joon-Goo Lee
Cited by: 2
References: 57

Abstract

This study compared two extraction methods for determining benzo[a]pyrene in commonly consumed Korean foods using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Two internal standards, BaP- d ₁₂ and 3-methylcholanthrene (3MC), were evaluated for their quantitative performance. The first preprocessing method, incorporating saponification and liquid–liquid extraction, achieved recoveries of 87.2–113.4% and lower detection limits (0.019–0.055 ng/g), whereas the QuEChERS method yielded recoveries of 92.1–113.3% and higher detection limits (0.191–0.309 ng/g). BaP was detected in more food samples with the first preprocessing method, with mean concentrations ranging from 0.073 ± 0.126 ng/g (coke) to 1.817 ± 0.355 ng/g (crab), all below Korea’s regulatory limit of 2 ng/g. Evaluation of the internal standards revealed that both BaP- d ₁₂ and 3MC yielded consistent quantitative trends, although slight variations were observed in specific matrices due to differences in matrix composition and ionization behavior. Overall, both internal standards proved suitable for LC–MS/MS-based BaP analysis, and their selection should depend on availability, matrix characteristics, analytical context, and instrument optimization. These results confirm that validated extraction, combined with the use of appropriate internal standards, ensures accurate and reproducible BaP determination in various food matrices.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals

Publication details

Journal / source
Journal of Food Composition and Analysis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Volume
153
Pages
109090–109090
Publication date
17 March 2026
Language
EN