Goethite as an antimony host-phase: Atomic-scale retention mechanisms and the selectivity of commonly-applied extraction schemes

Read full text
Authors: Mona Hosseinpour Moghaddam, Niloofar Karimian, Scott G. Johnston, Girish Choppala, Mohammad Rastegari, Edward D. Burton
Cited by: 2
References: 65

Abstract

Goethite (α-FeOOH) is one of the most important host-phases for Sb(V) in soils, sediments and geogenic wastes. This study examines, for the first time, how variability in the atomic-scale mechanisms of Sb(V) retention by goethite impacts the selectivity of commonly-applied Sb extraction schemes. EXAFS spectroscopy shows that Sb(V) retention via coprecipitation involves Sb(V) incorporation into goethite’s structure through Sb(V)-for-Fe(III) substitution. In contrast, Sb(V) retention via sorption involves edge and double-corner sharing between SbO 6 and FeO 6 octahedra at the goethite surface. Incorporation of Sb(V) into goethite's structure causes Sb(V) to be largely inaccessible to 1 M HCl, steps 1, 2 and 3 of Wenzel et al.'s sequential extraction scheme and all 3 steps of the BCR extraction scheme. In contrast, Sb(V) sorption to goethite's surface facilitates more substantial Sb(V) extractability, which varies with the relative abundance of SbO 6 -FeO 6 linkages. Importantly, Sb(V) sorption to the goethite surface is underestimated by both the Wenzel et al. and BCR schemes. In addition, the BCR scheme misidentifies a significant portion of goethite-sorbed Sb(V) as oxidisable phases (e.g. sulfides or organic matter). Hence, in soils, sediments or geogenic wastes where Sb(V) is sorbed to goethite, the BCR scheme is not appropriate for quantifying Sb(V) fractionation. Overall, our results demonstrate that variability in the atomic-scale mechanisms by which goethite retains Sb(V) translate to substantial complexity in Sb(V) extractability. • Mechanisms of Sb(V) retention by goethite were probed by EXAFS spectroscopy. • Coprecipitation involves Sb-for-Fe substitution within goethite’s crystal structure. • Sorption involves formation of surface complexes between SbO 6 and FeO 6 octahedra. • The atomic-scale Sb(V) retention mechanism strongly impacts Sb(V) extractability. • The BCR scheme fails to adequately portray Sb(V) mobilisation risk from goethite.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Arsenic contamination and mitigation Clay minerals and soil interactions Selenium in Biological Systems

Publication details

Journal / source
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Volume
503
Pages
141097–141097
Publication date
8 January 2026
Language
EN