A consensus-based classification of minor complications, major complications, and failure after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A modified delphi study

Read full text
Authors: Riccardo D’Ambrosi, Jakob Ackermann, Adrian Deichsel, Larissa Eckl, Lena Eggeling, Christoph Kittl, Brenda Laky, Dominic T. Mathis, Gergő Merkely, Lukas Nawid Münch, Maiti Münchgesang, Anton Ferdinand Schmidt
+36 more Karl-Friederich Schüttler, Arasch Wafaisade, Elisabeth Abermann, Andrea Achtnich, Ralph Akoto, Peter Angele, Roland Becker, Georg Brandl, David Henri Dejour, Florian Dirisamer, Björn H. Drews, Christian Egloff, Matthias J. Feucht, Christian Fink, Elmar Herbst, Erik Hohmann, Andreas Balthasar Imhoff, Tobias Jung, Peter Philipp Koch, Matthias Krause, Christian Lattermann, James H. Lubowitz, Julian T. Mehl, Natalie Mengis, Volker Mushal, Stefan Nehrer, Thomas Rudolf Pfeiffer, Sven Ulrich Scheffler, Christian Schoepp, Rainer Siebold, Martin J. Volz, Andy Williams, Lukas Willinger, Thore Zantop, Johannes Zellner, Daniel Guenther
Cited by: 1
References: 26

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to establish a consensus-based classification of postoperative events following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), clearly distinguishing no complication/normal clinical course, minor complication, major complication, and failure, using a structured Delphi methodology among international experts in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery. METHODS: A three-round modified Delphi process was conducted involving international high-volume ACL surgeons. An initial set of statements addressing potential postoperative events after ACLR was developed by a working group based on clinical expertise and contemporary literature. Panelists classified each statement as no complication/normal clinical course, minor complication, major complication, or failure. Consensus was predefined as ≥75% agreement within a single category. Statements reaching consensus were retained, whereas non-consensus statements were revised and re-evaluated in subsequent rounds. RESULTS: Thirty-nine experts completed the first and second Delphi rounds, and 30 (76.9%) completed the third round. The initial 52 statements were expanded to 67 in round two and refined to 46 in round three. Consensus was achieved for 14 statements (26.9%) in round one, 21 statements (31.3%) in round two, and 20 statements (43.5%) in round three. Overall, consensus was reached for 55 statements, forming the final classification framework. The panel clearly distinguished graft failure-defined as graft insufficiency or symptomatic instability-from major complications requiring surgical intervention or associated with substantial morbidity, and from minor complications or expected postoperative findings. Notably, traumatic graft rupture following a clearly documented new injury was not considered a postoperative complication. CONCLUSIONS: This international Delphi consensus establishes a standardized and clinically meaningful classification of postoperative events following ACLR. By clearly distinguishing no complication, minor complication, major complication, and failure, this framework provides a shared language that may improve consistency in outcome reporting, facilitate comparison across studies, and enhance the interpretability of clinical research and registry data. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V, expert consensus.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes Delphi Technique in Research

Publication details

Journal / source
Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Volume
18
Pages
101104–101104
Publication date
31 March 2026
Language
EN