A guide for the deployment, validation, and accreditation of clinical digital pathology tools

Read full text
Authors: Andrew R. Janowczyk, Johan Ferrari, Niels Brandt, Laura Padayachy, Aurélie Bornand, Suzanne Chartier, Thomas Mallet, Nicolas Roduit, Paul Townsend Seed, Medya Tekes Mizrakli, Julien Massonnet, Petros Liakopoulos
+4 more Vincent Braunersreuther, Mario Kreutzfeldt, Laura Rubbia‐Brandt, Doron Merkler
Cited by: 1
References: 54

Abstract

Digital pathology (DP) has become an integral part of modern diagnostic practice, enabling efficient workflows, reproducible assessments, and the integration of computational tools. While many institutions are transitioning toward digital diagnostics, deployment, validation, and routine usage of DP tools in clinical settings remains a major challenge. Existing recommendations often remain high-level, leaving laboratories without detailed, practical guidance on how to structure and document validation processes in real-world settings. To address this gap, we present a framework derived from the experience of Geneva University Hospitals (HUG), which since 2019 has operated a fully digital primary diagnostic workflow processing more than 230,000 slides annually. Drawing on this implementation, we outline best practices and lessons learned for the development, deployment, validation, and accreditation of DP tools. Document templates are also provided, which may serve as adaptable blueprints for other laboratories. This practical guide is intended to support reproducible, transparent, and audit-ready validation processes, helping institutions bridge the gap between general recommendations and operational deployment of DP tools in accredited diagnostic environments.

Fields of Study & Subjects

AI in cancer detection Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies

Publication details

Journal / source
Journal of Pathology Informatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Volume
23
Pages
100694–100694
Publication date
28 July 2026
Language
EN