The role of artificial intelligence in estimating stroke events in Moyamoya patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy

Read full text
Authors: Jeremiah Hilkiah Wijaya, Miguel Quintero Consuegra, Daniela Alejandra Perez-Chadid, Aafreen Azmi, Juan Pablo Ávila Madrigal, Shane Shahrestani, Sofía Ramírez-Guerrero, Anil Nanda, Abdelrahman Ramadan Elashry, Nestor R. Gonzalez
Cited by: 1
References: 21

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Moyamoya disease (MMD) and syndrome (MMS) are rare cerebrovascular arteriopathies marked by progressive internal carotid stenosis, fragile collateral networks, and a five-year stroke risk near 10% despite optimal care. Artificial-intelligence (AI) models integrating angiographic, perfusion, and clinical data show promise for risk stratification, but their diagnostic accuracy and clinical readiness remain uncertain. METHOD: We conducted a systematic review of AI algorithms for predicting ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke events in angiographically or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-confirmed MMD/MMS. PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus were searched through September 3, 2025, for English-language studies employing machine-learning, deep-learning, or radiomics models. We extracted sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) metrics and assessed study quality with Radiomics Quality Score and CLEAR checklists. Pooled estimates and summary receiver-operating characteristic curves were generated; decision-curve analysis evaluated clinical net benefit. RESULTS: Seven retrospective cohorts (n = 4,795) met inclusion criteria. The pooled sensitivity was 0.65 (95% CI 0.50-0.79) and specificity 0.85 (95% CI 0.82-0.89). The summary AUC was 0.85. Decision-curve analysis demonstrated that AI predictions improved net benefit over "treat-all" or "treat-none" strategies across relevant risk thresholds. Tree-based classifiers (XGBoost, random forest) showed more stable external performance than deep-learning networks. Explainability tools enhanced model interpretability. CONCLUSION: AI models achieve moderate-to-high accuracy for stroke prediction in MMD/MMS and offer potential for individualized risk stratification. However, small single-center datasets, heterogeneous imaging protocols, and opaque modeling limit clinical adoption. Prospective multicenter validation, standardized data pipelines, and robust explainability frameworks are essential for integrating AI into routine neurovascular care.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Moyamoya disease diagnosis and treatment Acute Ischemic Stroke Management Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Publication details

Journal / source
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Volume
35
Issue
3
Pages
108542–108542
Publication date
2 January 2026
Language
EN