Varying parameter ranges alters both partial rank correlation coefficient results and phenomenological behavior when modeling the epithelial mesenchymal transition

Partial Rank Correlation Coefficient (PRCC), usually performed following Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS), is a global sensitivity analysis that quantifies the monotonic relationship between model parameters and the desired output. To carry out this analysis, a range of acceptable parameter values must be known or estimated. However, within a biological context, approximating these values may be difficult. Parameter values and ranges can be taken from different organisms or systems or be estimated to produce qualitative phenomena in the model. Using a mathematical model of the epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) as a test case, this work examines how the parameter ranges chosen prior to analysis can influence LHS-PRCC results and shape subsequent analysis interpretations. Previous LHS-PRCC analysis of this model restricted parameters to ± 10% of their original value, which limits the scope and interpretability of parameter influence. Such a small range assumes, in the biological sense, that parameters are well-measured with little variability. Here, this work extends the previous analysis and explores several parameter ranges ( ± 25%, ± 50% of the original value). This work also tests whether, within the ± 10%, ± 25% and ± 50% parameter ranges, the bistable switch present in the original model are maintained. Ultimately, this work showcases how a choice made prior to analysis, such as the accepted parameter ranges for biological rates and values in complex dynamical systems can influence sensitivity analysis results and interpretability. Additionally, these choices can have hidden consequences, such as the loss of phenomenological behavior. Thus, explicit prior knowledge about the appropriate parameter values is needed before using analysis to guide future experiments and model development.