External validation and recalibration of cardiovascular risk scores for prediction of 10-year risk of fatal cardiovascular disease: a prospective, observational, population-based cohort analysis of adults in Mexico City

Read full text
Authors: Jerónimo Perezalonso-Espinosa, Daniel Ramirez-Garcia, Juan Pablo Díaz-Sánchez, Karime Berenice Carrillo-Herrera, Leslie Alitzel Cabrera-Quintana, Gael Dávila-López, Carlos A. Fermín‐Martínez, Andrea Malagón-Liceaga, Martín Roberto Basile-Álvarez, Jaime Berumen-Campos, Pablo Kuri‐Morales, Tapia-Conyer Roberto
+4 more Jesús Alegre-Díaz, Jacqueline A. Seiglie, Neftali Eduardo Antonio-Villa, Omar Yaxmehen Bello-Chavolla
Cited by: 2
References: 32

Abstract

Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of mortality in Latin America, yet most CVD risk equations were developed in high-income countries with limited validations in these settings. Here, we externally validated CVD risk prediction models for fatal CVD, and recalibrated the Globorisk-fatal model in Mexican population. Methods: We analyzed 112,262 adults ≥40 years, 67% (75,320) female and 33% (36,942) males, mean age 54.6 ± 10.7 years without prior CVD from the Mexico City Prospective Study. The primary outcome was 10-year fatal CVD, including myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke. CVD risk was estimated using the laboratory- and office-based Framingham, Globorisk, Globorisk-LAC, WHO, and SCORE2 equations. Discrimination was assessed with Harrell's c-statistic and AUROCs, calibration with mean estimates, slopes, and calibration curves, and overall performance with Brier scores. Sex-specific recalibration of the Globorisk-fatal model was performed using observed risks of fatal CVD. Findings: During 10 years of follow-up, 2429 fatal CVD events were recorded (1667 MI, 762 stroke). All models showed good discrimination, with c-statistics ranging from 0.761 to 0.805 in males and 0.797-0.831 in females. The Globorisk-fatal model had the highest c-statistic in females (0.831, 95% CI 0.821-0.841), and the laboratory-based WHO-MI model in males (0.805, 95% CI 0.783-0.827). Despite this, all equations consistently overestimated CVD risk, particularly in females. Calibration analyses revealed systematic overprediction at higher risk levels. Recalibration of the Globorisk-fatal model improved agreement between predicted and observed risks. Interpretation: CVD risk models showed good discrimination but consistently overestimated risk in this Mexican cohort. The recalibrated Globorisk-fatal model improves risk estimation of fatal CVD in Mexican adults. Funding: This research was supported by Instituto Nacional de Geriatría in Mexico.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Diabetes Cardiovascular Risks and Lipoproteins Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors

Publication details

Journal / source
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Volume
56
Pages
101403–101403
Publication date
16 February 2026
Language
EN