Longitudinal aging research in East and Southeast Asia: representativeness or depth?

Read full text
Authors: Liang-Kung Chen, Li-Ning Peng, Fei‐Yuan Hsiao
Cited by: 1
References: 8

Abstract

The systematic review by Malhotra and colleagues1 offers a comprehensive synthesis of community-based longitudinal aging studies across East and Southeast Asia (ESEA). Its timing is critical: with more than 30% of the world's older population residing in this region and aging accelerating faster than in most Western nations, the absence of robust longitudinal evidence is not merely a research gap but a policy failure in the making. Of the 30 eligible studies across 10 countries, 57% were concentrated in five high-income economies, while countries such as Indonesia, Cambodia, and Myanmar have none, a finding that reflects stark inequality in research capacity with direct implications for how widely ESEA-derived evidence can be safely generalized.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving Health disparities and outcomes Insurance Mortality Demography Risk Management

Publication details

Journal / source
The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Volume
70
Pages
101889–101889
Publication date
1 May 2026
Language
EN