Limitations and opportunities in multi-omics integration for neurodevelopmental, neurodegenerative and psychiatric disorders: A systematic review

Read full text
Authors: Luiza Marques Prates Behrens, Guilherme da Silva Fernandes, Gabriela Flores Gonçalves, Franklin Vinny Medina Nunes, Rafael Diogo Weimer, José Cláudio Fonseca Moreira, Márcio Dorn
Cited by: 3
References: 211

Abstract

Recent advances in high-throughput technologies have led to an increased generation of biological data across genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, epigenomics, and metabolomics. However, a major challenge remains: effectively integrating these multi-omics datasets to allow a more holistic understanding of the complex, interconnected mechanisms underlying human diseases. Neurodevelopmental, neurodegenerative, and psychiatric disorders are particularly multifactorial and heterogeneous, making them candidates for multi-omics approaches. In this context, this systematic review assesses the current state of multi-omics integration in neurological research. Records retrieved from five major databases were processed, and 156 studies were included for further analysis. The most frequently studied conditions were Alzheimer's Disease, Depressive Disorder and Parkinson's Disease, with epigenomics-transcriptomics and metagenomics-metabolomics emerging as the most common omics pairings. The field remains dominated by studies integrating pairs of omics layers. Only a limited number of computational tools are currently being applied to the integration of more than two omics layers, highlighting a gap in comprehensive multi-omics modeling. Despite progress, key challenges persist, including data accessibility and the need for standardized frameworks to allow cross-study comparisons. Moreover, most computational findings lack experimental validation in wet-laboratory settings. Future research should address these challenges, develop scalable algorithms for integrating multi-omics data, and leverage large, open-access datasets. Integrating computational predictions with experimental validation could help researchers prioritize high-confidence biomarkers relevant to clinical applications. Collaborative efforts among bioinformaticians, clinicians, and experimentalists will be essential to translating these advances into clinically actionable solutions.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Genetic Associations and Epidemiology Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks Genomics and Rare Diseases

Publication details

Journal / source
Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Volume
599
Pages
76–93
Publication date
2 February 2026
Language
EN