Identifying conservation gaps: A framework for evaluating national contributions to the 30 × 30 target

Read full text
Authors: Pil B.M. Pedersen, Anders Højgaard Petersen, Derek Corcoran, Niels Madsen, Jens-Christian Svenning, Karen Timmermann, Berit Charlotte Kaae, Theis Kragh, Birgitte Egelund Olsen, Niels Strange, Signe Normand, C Rahbek
Cited by: 1
References: 35

Abstract

International biodiversity policies call for protecting 30% of land and sea by 2030, requiring countries to demonstrate genuine progress toward this target. The pan-European Natura 2000 network of protected areas is currently considered to contribute by default. However, without rigorous assessments of protection effectiveness, official statistics risk substantially overestimating progress and undermining the target.Here, we introduce a science-based operational framework to rigorously assess national contributions to the 30 × 30 target. Applying this framework to Denmark using geospatial analysis reveals a stark discrepancy between reported and effective protection: although authorities report 15% of land and 29% of sea as protected, only 1.7% and 1.9% genuinely contribute. More than one-third of Danish Natura 2000 areas include land uses incompatible with long-term biodiversity protection.Our findings show that, without rigorous evaluation of protection effectiveness, national reporting can substantially overestimate progress. A science-based operational framework is essential to achieve the 30 × 30 target.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Conservation Ecology Wildlife Education Species Distribution and Climate Change Environmental Conservation and Management

Publication details

Journal / source
One Earth
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
101620–101620
Publication date
2 March 2026
Language
EN