Polygenic Risk Impacts Lifetime Risk and Prognosis of Glaucoma

Read full text
Authors: Eemeli S. Tusa, Max Tamlander, Samuli Ripatti, Mika P. Harju, Karita S.-T. Salo, Aarno Palotie, Mark Daly, Bridget Riley-Gills, Howard Jacob, Neelroop Parikshak, Luke Ward, Coralie Viollet
+88 more Slavé Petrovski, Alix Berton, Santha Ramakrishnan, Ellen Tsai, Zhihao Ding, Emily Holzinger, Robert Plenge, Joseph Maranville, Mark McCarthy, Rion Pendergrass, Jonathan Davitte, Chia‐Yen Chen, Melis Atalar Aksit, Anna Vlahiotis, Katherine Klinger, Clément Chatelain, Jörg Blankenstein, Karol Estrada, Robert Graham, Dawn Waterworth, Chris O´Donnell, Nicole Renaud, Tomi P. Mäkelä, Jaakko Kaprio, Minna Ruddock, Lila Kallio, Antti Hakanen, Terhi Kilpi, Markus Perola, Jukka Partanen, Taneli Raivio, Eero Punkka, Teija Kekonen, Raisa Serpi, Kati Kristiansson, Sanna Siltanen, Veli-Matti Kosma, Arto Mannermaa, Jari Laukkanen, Tiina Jokela, Johanna Mäkelä, Outi Tuovila, Jeffrey Waring, Bridget Riley-Gillis, Fedik Rahimov, Meritxell Oliva, Neelroop Parikshak, Luke Ward, Ioanna Tachmazidou, Slavé Petrovski, Alix Berton, Santha Ramakrishnan, Ellen Tsai, Zhihao Ding, Marc Jung, Hanati Tuoken, Shameek Biswas, Benjamin Sun, Rion Pendergrass, Jonathan Davitte, Neha Raghavan, Jae-Hoon Sul, Melis Atalar Aksit, Xinli Hu, Katherine Klinger, Robert Graham, Dawn Waterworth, Nicole Renaud, Ma ́en Obeidat, Jonathan Chung, Jonas Zierer, Mari Niemi, Samuli Ripatti, Johanna Schleutker, Markus Perola, Tiina Wahlfors, Mikko Arvas, Olli Carpén, Reetta Hinttala, Johannes Kettunen, Arto Mannermaa, Katriina Aalto‐Setälä, Mika Kähönen, Jari Laukkanen, Johanna Mäkelä, Hanna Kujala, Triin Laisk, Natalia Pujol
Cited by: 1
References: 20

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the clinical usefulness of a glaucoma polygenic risk score (PRS) for glaucoma by benchmarking published glaucoma PRSs and by assessing how the best-performing PRS performs for assessing glaucoma risk, age at onset, and glaucoma prognosis. DESIGN: Cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred two thousand seven hundred thirty-nine individuals in FinnGen, with 21 609 individuals who received a glaucoma diagnosis after 40 years of age. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Lifetime risk of glaucoma, the need and escalation of intraocular pressure-lowering medication, need for laser therapies, and need for incisional surgery. METHODS: Fourteen published glaucoma PRSs from the Polygenic Score Catalog were benchmarked comprehensively using Cox proportional hazards models. The best-performing PRS was selected to evaluate further the lifetime risk of glaucoma by 85 years of age using Kaplan-Meier survival analyses, both alone and alongside family history information. In addition, the impact of PRS on prognostic outcomes was assessed over a 20-year follow-up period. RESULTS: The PRS with the best performance had a hazard ratio (HR) of 3.32 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.21-3.43) for glaucoma (≥90th PRS percentile vs. 20th-80th percentile). Lifetime risk of glaucoma increased considerably across PRS categories from 2.5% (95% CI, 1.7%-3.3%) among individuals in the less than first percentile, to 31.9% (95% CI, 30.5%-33.3%) in the 95th to 99th percentiles, and to 45.3% (95% CI, 42.3%-48.1%) in the 99th percentile or more. Family history and PRS contributed independently to glaucoma risk, with the PRS effect size decreasing only by 4.2% when adjusting the PRS effect for family history. Those in the highest PRS decile required more intensive glaucoma care, with higher cumulative incidences of medication escalation (60.6% vs. 38.4%), laser therapies (39.8% vs. 22.9%), and incisional surgeries (15.8% vs. 9.5%) compared with the lowest PRS decile over a 20-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In this large biobank study, a glaucoma PRS effectively stratified individuals according to their lifetime risk of glaucoma, with substantial stratification evident already by midlife. The PRS provided a more precise risk assessment than family history alone, and it was effective in stratifying individuals based on several prognostic measures, including medical treatment escalation and surgical interventions. These findings support the potential usefulness of PRS-guided screening and management strategies in glaucoma, with future prospective studies warranted to evaluate the clinical implementation and cost-effectiveness. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Glaucoma and retinal disorders Corneal surgery and disorders Retinal Diseases and Treatments

Publication details

Journal / source
Ophthalmology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Volume
133
Issue
11
Pages
1308-1317
Publication date
1 June 2026
Language
EN