Understanding researchers' perceptions and experiences in finance research replication studies: A pre-registered study

Read full text
Authors: Daniel Chai, Searat Ali, Mark Brosnan, Tim Hasso
Cited by: 0
References: 11

Abstract

This pre-registered study executes the empirical design approved in the associated pre-registered report (Chai et al., 2024) to survey authors of replication studies at the Pacific-Basin Finance Journal (PBFJ). The survey aims to understand their motivations, challenges encountered, and perceived benefits, as well as their evaluations of the replication framework. The findings reveal strong support for replication studies, with participants emphasizing their role in fostering a more robust research culture in financial economics. However, challenges in reproduction and replication frequently arise due to issues with the accessibility and quality of open-source materials provided in the original studies. Our results also suggest that PBFJ's initiative offers a replicable model for other journals, providing actionable insights to address the replication crisis. Key recommendations include providing academic recognition for replication work, standardizing data transparency mandates, and promoting cross-disciplinary dialogue on robust research practices.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Academic Publishing and Open Access Publishing and Scholarly Communication scientometrics and bibliometrics research

Publication details

Journal / source
Pacific-Basin Finance Journal
Volume
96
Pages
103061–103061
Publication date
12 January 2026
Language
EN