Artificial incubation in family poultry farming systems in Brazil: technical feasibility and incubation performance

Read full text
Authors: Kimberly Cristina Abreu Alves, Márcio Gilberto Zangerônimo, Renata Ribeiro Alvarenga, Otoniel Félix Souza, Henrique Carneiro Lobato, Júlia Macedo Fernandes Oliveira, Adriana Gonçalves Silva, J.M.S. Martins, Kalu Chaves de Paula, Adriano Geraldo, L.J.C. Lara, Itallo Conrado Sousa Araujo
Cited by: 1
References: 20

Abstract

Family poultry farming plays an important role in food security and income generation in rural Brazil; however, chick production in these systems still relies predominantly on natural incubation, which limits productivity and flock renewal. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of artificial incubation in family poultry farming systems by characterizing the socioeconomic profile and knowledge of rural producers regarding artificial incubation, implementing training and incubator distribution, and comparing incubation performance between rural farm and laboratory environments. The research was conducted in four regions of Minas Gerais, Brazil, and involved 87 family poultry farmers operating free-range production systems. Structured questionnaires were applied to characterize producers' socioeconomic profiles, management practices, and knowledge regarding artificial incubation. From this group, 45 producers received theoretical and practical training (20 h) and were equipped with single-stage incubators with a capacity of 100 eggs. A total of 87 incubation trials were performed, including 45 trials on rural farms and 42 trials in laboratory environments. Producers were predominantly aged 50 years or older, had low formal education, and reported poultry farming as their main animal production activity. Although 74.7% were familiar with artificial incubation and recognized its advantages, reliance on broody hens (49.4%) and lack of egg sanitization (60.9%) were still common. There were no differences between farm and laboratory settings regarding hatchability (62.40 ± 2.19% vs. 62.87 ± 2.45%), hatchability of fertile eggs (80.09 ± 1.90% vs. 78.36 ± 2.38%), fertility (77.79 ± 1.81% vs. 80.42 ± 1.99%), stage-specific embryonic mortality, or overall incubation losses. These results demonstrate that family poultry farmers, when provided with appropriate training and technical support, are capable of achieving incubation outcomes equivalent to those obtained under controlled laboratory conditions. Artificial incubation is therefore a technically viable and scalable technology to improve chick availability, support flock renewal, and strengthen family poultry farming systems in Brazil.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Livestock and Poultry Management Animal Nutrition and Physiology Agricultural Systems and Practices

Publication details

Journal / source
Poultry Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Volume
105
Issue
6
Pages
106732–106732
Publication date
3 March 2026
Language
EN