Access and engagement with maternity, social care and mental health services for perinatal migrant women with no recourse to public funds and irregular status: A cross-sectional study using the eLIXIR born in South London, UK, maternity-child data linkage

Read full text
Authors: Dr Hannah Rayment-Jones, Sam Burton, Tisha Dasgupta, Zenab Barry, Kaat De Backer, Natasha Baker, Claire A. Wilson, Kerrie Stevenson, Zoë Vowles, Kirsty Kitchen, Abigail Easter, Andy Jolly
+22 more Judith Rankin, Cristina Fernandez-Turienzo, Jane K. Sandall, Lucilla Poston, Laura A. Magee, Robert Stewart, David John Edwards, Mark Ashworth, Jane K. Sandall, Ingrid Wolfe, Cheryl Gillett, Michael Absoud, Lucy Pickard, Amanda Grey, Sarah E. Spring, Toyin Kazeem, Amelia Jewell, Matthew T.M. Broadbent, Finola Higgins, Leonardo de Jongh, Tisha Dasgupta, Carolyn A. Gill
Cited by: 1
References: 27

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In the UK, an estimated two million migrants are irregular or subject to No Recourse to Public Funds (NRPF) visa conditions, restricting welfare access and often requiring payment for NHS maternity care. The impact on maternity and perinatal service use remains poorly quantified. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study. METHODS: We used linked electronic health records from maternity, neonatal, and mental health services in South London (eLIXIR-BiSL cohort). The sample included 56,690 women with 67,308 pregnancies (Oct 2018-Oct 2023). Migration status was categorised as UK-born, migrants with recourse to public funds, NRPF, or unknown visa status. Adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) were estimated using generalised linear models, controlling for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: Compared with UK-born women, migrants, particularly those with NRPF, had lower engagement with services. Women with NRPF were less likely to access early antenatal care (aRR 0.36 [0.33-0.38]), attend maternity triage (0.89 [0.82-0.96]), or birth in midwife-led settings (0.51 [0.36-0.71]). They were more likely to access care late (3.61 [3.33-3.92]), receive inadequate antenatal care (1.41 [1.30-1.53]), transfer providers (1.54 [1.36-1.74]), and experience prolonged postnatal stays (1.38 [1.21-1.57]). Women with NRPF had lower mental health care contact before (0.05 [0.03-0.08]) and during pregnancy (0.51 [0.37-0.69]), and reduced engagement with social care (0.36 [0.17-0.70]) and the criminal justice system (0.30 [0.19-0.44]). CONCLUSIONS: Migrants with NRPF or unknown visa status face persistent barriers to maternity and mental health care. Inclusive reforms are needed to address inequity.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum Migration Health and Trauma demographic modeling and climate adaptation

Publication details

Journal / source
Public Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Volume
252
Pages
106175–106175
Publication date
3 February 2026
Language
EN