The illusion of healthy drinking: Methodological bias and selective reporting of effects shape evidence on alcohol and cardiovascular health

Read full text
Authors: Susanne Stolpe, Kathrin Schlößler, Horst Christian Vollmar, Bernd Kowall
Cited by: 3
References: 36

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In 2023, after a review concluding that methodological shortfalls are mainly responsible for reported beneficial health effects of alcohol, public health institutions recommended to abstain from drinking. Yet, reports of health benefits from moderate drinking persist. We aimed to explore whether known sources of bias and distortion were accounted for in underlying analyses. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic literature search and methodological analysis of retrieved publications. METHODS: Papers on associations between alcohol consumption and all-cause mortality and cardiovascular outcomes published between January 2023 and July 2025 were identified. Characteristics of study populations and analyses were described and acknowledgement and addressing of relevant methodological issues explored. RESULTS: Five of eight studies included reported protective effects of low or moderate alcohol intake, while three reported less positive effects. Studies showing protective effects used non-drinkers or lifetime abstainers as reference- categories known to be prone to misclassification and bias. Only one study discussed methodological issues, and none applied any method to assess or mitigate potential distortion. Reported hazard reductions of 40% for cardiovascular outcomes after minimal exposures of

Fields of Study & Subjects

Statistical Methods in Epidemiology Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects Reliability and Agreement in Measurement

Publication details

Journal / source
Public Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Volume
256
Pages
106331–106331
Publication date
13 May 2026
Language
EN