Soil organic carbon response to no-till is conditioned by edaphoclimatic moderators in tropical agriculture: Evidence from Brazil

Read full text
Authors: Altene JEAN-LOUIS, Giulia Ketlen Sanches, Sérgio Abílio Azevedo, Johnny Jean, Bruno Montoani Silva, Ana Carolina Barbosa, Samara Martins Barbosa, Jéssica Oliveira Notório Ribeiro, Renan PREVIL, Vanêssa Lopes de Faria, Rafaella Tatiane Silva de Sá, Juliano Vilela OLIVEIRA
+1 more Junior César Avanzi
Cited by: 1
References: 53

Abstract

Fixed-depth soil sampling can bias soil organic carbon (SOC) stock comparisons between no-tillage (NT) and conventional tillage (CT) when bulk density differs between systems, yet many tropical syntheses have not corrected for this effect. A systematic review compiled 46 studies from 58 sites across five Brazilian biomes, Cerrado, Mata Atlântica, Amazônia, Caatinga, and Pampa, and applied a CT-anchored equivalent soil mass (ESM) framework to harmonize SOC stocks across cumulative depth strata of 0–20, 0–40, 0–60, and 0–100 cm. The dataset was dominated by Ferralsols (Latossolos, Oxisols), Cambisols (Cambissolos, Inceptisols) and Acrisols (Argissolos, Ultisols). In the paired meta-analytic subset, NT increased SOC stocks by 18% relative to CT (NT/CT = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.11–1.26), although the prediction interval (0.84–1.74) indicated substantial context dependence. ESM-standardized profiles showed that gains extended to 0–60 cm in the Cerrado and Mata Atlântica, whereas responses were near zero in the Caatinga and largely surface-confined in Amazônia. Time since NT adoption was not a significant moderator, despite NT showing higher SOC stocks throughout the entire evaluated period. In moderator analyses of SOC stocks under NT, clay content showed a positive association, whereas mean annual rainfall showed a negative association. These findings demonstrate that mass-corrected, profile-integrated accounting substantially alters estimates of NT mitigation potential in tropical agroecosystems and underscore the need for carbon accounting frameworks to incorporate ESM approaches and stratification by texture and moisture regime to avoid systematic bias in cross-climate comparisons. Such integration is relevant for Measurement, Reporting, and Verification systems supporting national climate commitments, including Brazil’s Nationally Determined Contribution and Low Carbon Agriculture Plan, but is equally applicable to global assessments of conservation agriculture.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics Soil Geostatistics and Mapping Soil Management and Crop Yield

Publication details

Journal / source
Soil and Tillage Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Volume
263
Pages
107266–107266
Publication date
12 May 2026
Language
EN