A contemporary nationwide analysis of neoadjuvant regimens for esophageal adenocarcinoma

Read full text
Authors: Jorge Humberto Rodríguez-Quintero, Grace Ha, Rajika Jindani, Isaac Loh, Rolfy A. Perez Holguin, Neel P. Chudgar, Brendon Matthew Stiles
Cited by: 0
References: 29

Abstract

Background: In the United States, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with CROSS (41.6 Gy, carboplatin/paclitaxel) has been the standard for patients with operable locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Recently, the ESOPEC multicenter phase III trial reported superior overall survival (OS) with perioperative FLOT (5-FU/leucovorin/oxaliplatin/docetaxel) compared to CROSS. We aimed to examine trends in neoadjuvant treatment strategies and compare outcomes in a contemporary real-world cohort. Methods: Patients with clinical stage II-IVA (T2-4aN0-3M0 by the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th Edition staging classification) EAC who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT; ≥41.4 Gy) or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) followed by esophagectomy were identified in the National Cancer Database (2015-2022). Postoperative outcomes and overall survival (Kaplan-Meier) were compared in propensity-matched cohorts. Results: = .029; hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.68-0.98) and a better 5-year OS rate (49.8% vs 43.3%) at a median follow-up of 28.8 months (IQR, 17.2-42.5 months). Conclusions: In a contemporary cohort of patients with locally advanced EAC, nCRT remained the predominant approach. However, consistent with ESOPEC, nCT alone was associated with improved OS.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes Head and Neck Cancer Studies

Publication details

Journal / source
JTCVS Open
Volume
30
Pages
101591–101591
Publication date
20 January 2026
Language
EN