Alcman 58 and Simonides 542

View at publisher
Authors: P. E. Easterling, Felix Budelmann, Eveline Krummen
Cited by: 0
References: 1

Abstract

There are no serious textual variants; Bentley’s παῖς looks a certain supplement. The context in which the fragment is quoted (Hephaestion 13.6, p. 42 Consbr.) is a discussion of the cretic; the lines are cited as a metrical example, without reference to their meaning. Meineke’s comment on the passage was sensus non plane liquet , but it is tempting to go further, because this is the earliest extant reference to Eros at play, an idea that was to be interestingly influential in later poetry.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Classical Antiquity Studies Classical Studies and Philology Classical Philosophy and Thought

Publication details

Journal / source
Cambridge University Press eBooks
Pages
47–55
Publication date
27 February 2026
Language
EN
Document type
Book chapter