Introduction

Read full text
Authors: Susanna Elm, Kristina Sessa
Cited by: 0
References: 6

Abstract

“War,” writes military historian Alexander Sarantis, “is largely a niche area rather than a mainstream concern of late antique and Byzantine studies, which tend to be dominated by theological, literary, artistic, and socio-economic themes.” The fact that war and warfare now occupy a “relatively marginal position in modern scholarship” reflects a number of shifts in the academic landscape, from the reframing of Late Antiquity as a period of change and continuity (rather than an epoch of decline) to the entrenchment of cultural history as the dominant approach in history departments across North America and Europe. And yet, even as military historians have dismantled stale theses about “military decay” as the root cause of the empire’s geopolitical fragmentation and show the late Roman army to have been a source of Rome’s extraordinary resilience, “their” topics of war, warfare, and the army nonetheless fail to resonate with most scholars of Late Antiquity. As Bryan Ward-Perkins wryly notes in his controversial 2005 book, The Fall of Rome and the End of Civilization , “banishing catastrophe” has become a mainstream response to late antique narrative history. Where has war gone?

Fields of Study & Subjects

Classical Antiquity Studies Historical and Religious Studies of Rome Byzantine Studies and History

Publication details

Journal / source
Cambridge University Press eBooks
Pages
1–10
Publication date
9 January 2026
Document type
Book chapter