Oath Taking and Legal Performance
Abstract
This chapter examines a series of court cases in Hong Kong in which a number of newly elected legislators were disqualified from taking office in part because the ways in which they took their oaths during the swearing-in ceremony were deemed too flamboyant, too extravagant and too theatrical to be taken seriously. Implicit in the legal and political objections to their oath taking is the view that theatre has no place in the hallowed chambers of the law courts or the legislature, a view that is all the more surprising given the intertwined histories and representational strategies between law and theatre. Taking these cases as a starting point, I explore what may be at stake in this legal anti-theatricality, and argue that law’s determination to expurgate the theatrical could be read as part of an attempt to render invisible its own performative nature.
Fields of Study & Subjects
Law in Society and Culture
Theatre and Performance Studies
Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics
Publication details
- Journal / source
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Pages
- 239–257
- Publication date
- 27 February 2026
- Language
- EN
- Document type
- Book chapter