Introduction to Volume III

View at publisher
Authors: Andrew Fitzmaurice, Rachel Hammersley
Cited by: 0
References: 6

Abstract

When authors in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries wrote about what it meant to have rights, they discussed a great diversity of ways in which that concept could be understood, but they almost always concurred on one point. It was vital, they argued, that right should never be conflated with power. As Hugo Grotius put it, we must never agree with the claim that might is right. The twenty-six essays in this volume show that the idea of rights was widely used in the early modern period to resist and limit power. Accordingly, modern liberals have portrayed the period in terms of a struggle for rights against arbitrary power. However, the authors in this volume question that the story of rights as resistance was the dominant narrative of rights. If there was a dominant discourse of rights in the early modern period at all, it was one in which rights were coextensive with power.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought Medieval and Early Modern Justice Renaissance and Early Modern Studies

Publication details

Journal / source
Cambridge University Press eBooks
Pages
1–14
Publication date
29 January 2026
Document type
Book chapter