The Arguments

View at publisher
Authors: Brad Inwood
Cited by: 0

Abstract

An analysis of the main deliberative argument of the dialogue, showing how the speech of the laws provides premises needed for that argument. The argument between Socrates and Crito that one must in no circumstances do wrong needs to be completed by establishing that it is wrong to break an agreement and that an agreement exists beween Socrates and the city, and this is what the speech of the laws provides. The dialogue contains a single main argument, a practical deliberation. Socrates’ determination to follow the argument whereever it leads is thus dramatically illustrated by his willingness to die for this principle (which he construes as the path on which the god leads him).

Fields of Study & Subjects

Classical Philosophy and Thought Classical Antiquity Studies Philosophical Ethics and Theory

Publication details

Journal / source
Cambridge University Press eBooks
Pages
14–58
Publication date
4 March 2026
Language
EN
Document type
Book chapter