I-O psychology and labor: Making up for benign neglect, antipathy, and missed opportunities

View at publisher
Authors: Joel Lefkowitz, Michael J. Zickar, Wayne F. Cascio, Thomas A. Kochan
Cited by: 6
References: 54

Abstract

Abstract Industrial-organizational (I-O) psychology has largely ignored organized labor, both in terms of our research interests and as a potential domain of professional practice. Historically, some I-O psychologists have even engaged in antilabor activities. This article aims to make that history more salient to current members of the profession, help us better understand how and why that schism came about, note the adverse effects on our understanding of organizations and contributing to employee well-being and organizational effectiveness, and highlight associated ethical issues. We offer suggestions on how to address the situation, drawing on examples from the field of industrial relations. We also consider the impact of the current antilabor, antidemocratic US government administration. We conclude by offering some suggested prompts for commentaries to the article.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Occupational and Professional Licensing Regulation Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior

Publication details

Journal / source
Industrial and Organizational Psychology
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
123–139
Publication date
7 January 2026
Language
EN