Lower Court Disagreements as Cues for Agenda Setting in the High Court of Australia

Read full text
Authors: Russell Smyth, Pat Leslie, Tonja Jacobi, Zoë Robinson
Cited by: 1
References: 35

Abstract

Abstract We extend cue theory to examine why and how dissent on the court below acts as a cue to apex courts in selecting the cases they hear. We posit that dissent on the court below is a cue to the apex court that the case involves complex legal issues. To test our predictions about how dissent on the court below affects the selection of cases and factors mediating and moderating this relationship, we use original data on 8,405 special leave applications to the High Court of Australia (2003–2018), finding evidence in support of cue theory.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Judicial and Constitutional Studies Jury Decision Making Processes Commonwealth Australian Politics and Federalism

Publication details

Journal / source
Journal of Law and Courts
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
1–22
Publication date
20 April 2026
Language
EN