Examining the development of automated, personalised, dietary feedback using digital technologies: a systematic review

Read full text
Authors: Samara Legrand, Heidi Ng, Eva L. Jenkins, Aimee L. Dordevic, Kentaro Murakami, Nana Shinozaki, Hoan M.T. Dang, Maxine P. Bonham, Tracy A. McCaffrey
Cited by: 1
References: 117

Abstract

Digital technologies provide a convenient and scalable approach to dietary assessment and personalised feedback, facilitating behaviour change. This is essential for reducing the prevalence of non-communicable diseases at a population level. However, the evaluation of the acceptability and feasibility of dietary feedback delivered via online platforms has not been thoroughly investigated. By utilising the term ‘system architecture’ to describe the essential components of the digital approach to capturing dietary feedback, this systematic review outlines the platform, dietary assessment methodology, reference values for assessing dietary intake and elements of personalised dietary feedback. When reported, the acceptability and feasibility of personalised feedback were captured. OVID Medline, OVID Embase, Scopus via Elsevier and Cinahl Plus via EBSCO identified 5839 studies. Search terms included dietary assessment, feedback and digital technologies. In total, twenty-eight studies involving 301 271 participants were included. Food frequency questionnaires were the most commonly used dietary assessment method, accessed via web-based platforms. Dietary intake was commonly assessed using a diet quality index, and feedback was provided on food groups, often combined with a diet quality score or macronutrient analysis. While participant acceptance of personalised dietary feedback was generally high, the overall completion rates for acceptability questionnaires were low, and feasibility was seldom reported. Methods used to measure acceptability and feasibility varied, preventing comparisons across studies. Study quality was high; however, future research would benefit from the involvement of stakeholders and end-users in designing feedback messages.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Nutrition Genetics and Disease Nutritional Studies and Diet Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact

Publication details

Journal / source
Nutrition Research Reviews
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Volume
39
Pages
e15–e15
Publication date
1 January 2026
Language
EN