Bird monitoring in Africa: present state and future prospects

Read full text
Authors: Philip W. Atkinson, Ngoné Diop, Robert A. Robinson, Res Altwegg, Arjun Amar, Ian Barber, Andre J. Botha, Graeme M. Buchanan, Achilles Byaruhanga, Adams Chaskda, Imad Cherkaoui, Norbert J. Cordeiro
+35 more Nonie Coulthard, Colin Cross, Laura Dami, N. Deacon, Pierre Defos du Rau, Sergey Dereliev, Clémence Deschamps, Tim Dodman, Paul Gacheru, Wenceslas Gatarabirwa, Richard Gregory, Danny Heptinstall, Samuel T. Ivande, Nancy Job, Gwawr Jones, Alan T. K. Lee, Angus Middleton, Victor J. Mkongewa, P. Kariuki Ndang’ang’a, Darcy Ogada, Chris J. Orsman, Ulf Ottosson, Julia Pierini, Bruno G. Portier, Hugo Rainey, Ernst F Retief, Marc van Roomen, Peter G. Ryan, Sarah Elizabeth Scott, Talatu Tende, Robert L. Thomson, Mpho Williart, Paul Woodcock, Simon R. Wotton, Paul Robinson
Cited by: 2
References: 63

Abstract

Summary Biodiversity monitoring is essential to inform the state of wildlife populations, and the impacts of environmental change, conservation intervention, and sustainable development policies and actions. We review the current state of bird monitoring across Africa using public questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. We received 87 questionnaire responses from 46 (of 54) countries and, additionally, 24 in-depth interviews were carried out. Multiple data collection methods were reported with total counts of individuals being most frequent, but all-species surveys, essential for quantifying ecosystem health, were restricted to bird atlases and Common Bird Monitoring (CBM) projects in Kenya, Uganda, and Botswana. Data collection relied largely on volunteers, but their motivation, recruitment, training, and retention is a continuing challenge. The most sustainable programmes were driven by clear policy objectives (e.g. waterbird monitoring under the Ramsar Convention or the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species), monitoring of individual groups (e.g. raptors, vultures, bustards), specific threatened species, and where clear national priorities had been set within government agencies. Use of monitoring data by governments in country biodiversity reports or National Biodiversity Species Action Plans (NBSAPs) varied widely and, for many countries, simply did not exist. A lack of skilled analysts and a comprehensive approach to data curation and ownership were identified as major limitations. A more strategic approach to funding and monitoring is needed, whereby smaller funders collaborate to reduce costs associated with applying for small amounts of money, and bird (and biodiversity) monitoring is explicitly integrated with sustainable development goals to exploit broader funding streams.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Species Distribution and Climate Change Wildlife Ecology and Conservation Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses

Publication details

Journal / source
Bird Conservation International
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Volume
36
Publication date
1 January 2026
Language
EN