Propionic Acid Outperforms Formic and Acetic Acid in MS Sensitivity for High-Flow Reversed-Phase LC-MS Bottom-Up Proteomics

Read full text
Authors: Mykyta R. Starovoit, Siddharth Jadeja, Rudolf Kupčík, Saša Vatić, Jan Rasl, Derya Demir, Petr Novák, Cameron Braswell, Benjamin C. Orsburn, Juraj Lenčo
Cited by: 3
References: 64

Abstract

Formic acid has long been the default acidic additive in reversed-phase LC-MS-based bottom-up proteomics, offering a practical balance between chromatographic performance and electrospray ionization (ESI) efficiency. Here, we evaluate propionic acid as an alternative mobile phase acidifier, a candidate that has been largely overlooked in efforts to improve ESI efficiency without compromising chromatography. By reducing both the ionic strength and surface tension of the mobile phase, propionic acid markedly enhanced ESI efficiency, yielding an average 39% increase in peptide identifications compared to formic acid and even a 12% increase relative to the recently revived acetic acid. These gains were consistent across interlaboratory data sets encompassing analytical- and microflow LC-MS configurations, diverse column chemistries, and varying sample complexities. Importantly, chromatographic performance remained virtually unaffected, with only a minor reduction in peptide retention. The mobile phase containing propionic acid was stable, instrument-compatible, and introduced a negligible background signal. Collectively, these findings challenge the long-standing reliance on formic acid and establish propionic acid as a robust, drop-in alternative for high-flow LC-MS workflows prioritizing MS sensitivity and proteome depth.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies

Publication details

Journal / source
Analytical Chemistry
Publisher
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Volume
98
Issue
14
Pages
10572–10583
Publication date
3 April 2026
Language
EN