Revisiting the Biomass Pyrolysis Chemical Percolation Devolatilization Model

Read full text
Authors: Odd A. Andersen, Nils Erland L. Haugen
Cited by: 0
References: 24

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide It is found that due to a simplification in the metaplast model, the original chemical percolation devolatilization (CPD) model does not ensure mass conservation. This is caused by the fact that evacuation of tar is only approximately accounted for in the underlying formulas derived from percolation theory. In this paper, a new version of the metaplast model is developed and implemented in a Julia-based solver. This correction also results in some corrections to the kinetic data for lignin, cellulose, and hemicellulose. The new Julia solver includes two versions, one for small particles where no spatial resolution is required and a spatially resolved version. The spatially resolved version is used to find that, even for pyrolyzing particles, a Biot number of unity is a sufficient criterion to determine when spatial models must be used.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes Thermal and Kinetic Analysis Coal Combustion and Slurry Processing

Publication details

Journal / source
Energy & Fuels
Volume
40
Issue
7
Pages
3637–3646
Publication date
9 February 2026
Language
EN