Implementation of Sterilization and Disinfection Protocols for Potentiometric Microneedle Sensors: A Requirement for a Safety Assertion

Read full text
Authors: Xue Hui, Agueda Molinero-Fernandez, Ruben Zapata-Pérez, Yuxin Chen, María Cuartero, Gastón A. Crespo
Cited by: 1
References: 40

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Microneedle (MN) sensors represent a promising technology for disease surveillance. For their application in long-term animal studies and preclinical research, they must exhibit both analytical reliability and biosafety, including the elimination of microorganisms capable of inducing infection. Nonetheless, MNs’ compatibility with conventional sterilization and disinfection methods remains largely unexplored. Accordingly, we introduce the first systematic evaluation of the compatibility of potentiometric MN sensors with sterilization and high-level disinfection protocols widely available in laboratory settings, including ethanol, autoclave, and UV-C exposure. As a proof-of-concept, we assess the impact of these three protocols on the analytical performance of a complete potentiometric cell in the MN configuration (i.e., pH-MN based on tridodecylamine as hydrogen ionophore and polyurethane as polymer matrix and polyvinyl butyral-Ag/AgCl reference electrode MN). Ethanol treatment preserved the calibration parameters of the sensor, maintaining a near-Nernstian response even after prolonged exposure (30 min), with minimal change in the slope (58.9 vs 57.9 mV pH −1 ). Slight variations were observed in the standard potential ( E 0 ), although all differences remained below 5%. In contrast, autoclaving severely compromised both MN electrodes, confirming incompatibility with our pH-MN design. Then, UV-C was further optimized through a two-step exposure protocol, resulting in the maintenance of the sensor accuracy with

Fields of Study & Subjects

Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery Analytical Chemistry and Sensors Polydiacetylene-based materials and applications

Publication details

Journal / source
ACS Sensors
Publisher
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
XXX–XXX
Publication date
13 February 2026
Language
EN