A Top-Down View of Global and Regional Carbon Budgets From an Ensemble of Atmospheric Inversions

Read full text
Authors: A. M. van der Woude, I. T. Luijkx, RJ Kok, W. Peters, F. Chevallier, C. Rödenbeck, P. Ciais, N. Chandra, K. Wang, R. Janardanan, H. van Asperen, A. Bastos
+38 more A. van den Berg, A.A. Bloom, S. Botia, K. Bowman, J.G. Canadell, R. A. F. de Souza, C. Q. Dias‐Júnior, L. Feng, P. Friedlingstein, L. Gatti, E. Gloor, K. Ishijima, F. Jiang, Z. Jin, W. Ju, X. Lan, J. Liu, Z. Liu, T. Machida, S. Maksyutov, A. Manning, A. Martinez, G. A. Martins, K. McKain, J. B. Miller, L. Nayagam, Y. Niwa, P. Palmer, P. K. Patra, P. A. Pickers, B. Poulter, B. B. Stephens, C. Sweeney, S. C. Wofsy, Z. Wu, D. Yang, J. Yun, N. Zeng
Cited by: 1
References: 170

Abstract

Atmospheric inversions provide surface CO 2 flux estimates based on in situ observed atmospheric CO 2 mole fractions or satellite‐based column average CO 2 (XCO 2). Here, we provide a detailed assessment of 14 atmospheric CO 2 inversions included in the Global Carbon Budget (GCB2024). We develop tools to further assess and use these inversions in global and regional carbon cycle studies including the GCB and the REgional Carbon Cycle Assessment and Processes (RECCAP2) initiative. We show that the global atmospheric CO 2 growth rate and its interannual variability are reproduced well by all inversions. In contrast to bottom‐up models, inversions provide carbon flux estimates directly constrained by observations. Our ensemble mean estimates of the global sinks for the period 2015-2023 are −1.410.55 PgC yr −1 for the net land sink (including land‐use change emissions) and −2.970.55 PgC yr −1 for the global net ocean sink (uncertainties reported as across inversions; estimates include fossil fuel and river flux adjustments). On regional scales, we find significant spread in flux estimates between inversions across regions, and we present criteria and metrics to derive flux‐observation relation constraints or subselect ensembles of inversions based on independent observations. Furthermore, we use the atmospheric inversions to assess the atmospheric growth rate of CO 2 . We show that the factor used to convert annual observation‐based growth rates to net fluxes is variable over time as a result of atmospheric mixing. Finally, we propose guidelines on how to use the inverse results in global and regional carbon budget studies by the wider carbon cycle community.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics Marine and coastal ecosystems Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics

Publication details

Journal / source
NOAA Institutional Repository
Publisher
American Geophysical Union (AGU)
Volume
40
Issue
6
Publication date
21 June 2026
Language
EN