Remotely Sensed Surface Water Storage Shows Distinct Patterns From SWAT‐Simulated Data

Read full text
Authors: W. Dolan, M. K. Vanderhoof, J. R. Christensen, H. E. Golden, C. R. Lane, A. Rajib, W. Keenan, Q. Zheng, A. Khare
Cited by: 1
References: 69

Abstract

Abstract Quantifying and projecting the downstream benefits of water stored in lakes and wetlands (SW storage ) requires watershed hydrologic models, which often parameterize surface water storage in topographic depressions using static digital elevation model (DEM) data. Calibration and validation of modeled SW storage dynamics using external data sets is uncommon, particularly across major river basins, with model calibration typically focused on observed discharge. Here, we develop and assess a novel remote sensing‐based (RS) SW storage data set (Sentinel‐1 and Sentinel‐2) for verifying simulated SW storage estimates from a Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model of the Upper Mississippi River Basin (UMRB; ∼440,000 km 2 ). Our results suggest that static DEM‐based parameterization as well as model calibration based solely on discharge do not adequately capture spatial and temporal SW storage dynamics in the UMRB. Mean SW storage as estimated by SWAT was 74% ± 122% (mean ± standard deviation) higher than RS SW storage , where SW storage in SWAT was underestimated in wetland‐rich subbasins and overestimated in agricultural, tile‐drained subbasins. Time series of SWAT SW storage and RS SW storage were positively correlated in only 38.8% of subbasins. As RS SW storage is also vulnerable to error, storage estimates were compared to bathymetric data in select small wetlands. While uncertainty remains in the conversion from extent to storage for RS SW storage , the method and data set presented here are a promising option for improved parameterization and calibration of SW storage processes in SWAT and other process‐based hydrologic models. Further consideration of these storage processes can potentially improve the accuracy of simulated streamflow in wetland‐rich model domains.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies Flood Risk Assessment and Management Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics

Publication details

Journal / source
Water Resources Research
Publisher
American Geophysical Union (AGU)
Volume
62
Issue
6
Pages
e2025WR040206–e2025WR040206
Publication date
1 June 2026
Language
EN