Testing the robustness of daily associations of affect with alcohol and cannabis use.

Read full text
Authors: Jonas Dora, Adam M. Kuczynski, Connor J. McCabe, Kasey G. Creswell, Robert D. Dvorak, Andrea L. Howard, Megan E. Patrick, Yuichi Shoda, Gregory T. Smith, Aidan G. C. Wright, Kevin M. King
Cited by: 1

Abstract

< .001), with 20.6% of specifications reaching significance. This counterintuitive pattern was strongest for sadness and when examining maximum daily negative affect. Surprisingly, and contrary to theoretical predictions, this negative association was slightly more pronounced among those with higher coping motives and at lower levels of alcohol use disorder symptoms. Positive affect showed a complex pattern, with high-arousal states like joviality strongly predicting increased drinking likelihood, whereas low-arousal states showed weaker associations. Neither affect type consistently predicted drinking quantity. For cannabis use, neither positive nor negative affect predicted use likelihood or quantity across specifications. These associations remained consistent regardless of substance use disorder severity or social context. Our findings challenge core assumptions of affect regulation models and suggest that, at least in young adults, the affect-substance use relationship is more nuanced than previously theorized, with implications for refining etiological models. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

Fields of Study & Subjects

Mental Health Research Topics Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes Mental Health via Writing

Publication details

Journal / source
Journal of Psychopathology and Clinical Science
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Volume
135
Issue
3
Pages
413–432
Publication date
19 February 2026
Language
EN