On the relationship between indirect measures of Black versus White racial attitudes and discriminatory outcomes: An adversarial collaboration using a sample of White Americans.

Read full text
Authors: Jordan R. Axt, Paul Connor, Suzanne Hoogeveen, Cory Clark, Michelangelo Vianello, Joanna Lahey, Adam Hahn, Jeffrey To, Richard E. Petty, Thomas H. Costello, Gregory Mitchell, Philip E. Tetlock
+1 more Eric Luis Uhlmann
Cited by: 2

Abstract

= 2,114). Using structural equation models that can account for measurement error, frequentist and Bayesian multiverse analyses confirmed that White Americans' performance on indirect measures correlate modestly with these behavioral outcomes, and explain unique variance (∼2.5%) beyond direct, self-report measures of racial attitudes. At the same time, self-report measures exhibited greater predictive and incremental validity than indirect measures (explaining ∼45% of the variance) despite behavioral measures of discrimination displaying weak internal reliability. Results provided some support for greater predictive and incremental validity for indirect measures among participants scoring relatively low on measures of executive function and motivation to control prejudice. These results lend themselves to both relatively optimistic and pessimistic interpretations concerning scientific and practical significance. All collaborators agree that the best path forward is collaborative and focused on the generalizability of implicit racial attitudes to high-accountability organizational settings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

Fields of Study & Subjects

Social and Intergroup Psychology Gender Diversity and Inequality Names Identity and Discrimination Research

Publication details

Journal / source
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Volume
130
Issue
6
Pages
1121–1146
Publication date
2 March 2026
Language
EN