Indecision and recency-weighted evidence integration in non-clinical and clinical settings

Read full text
Authors: Magdalena del Río, Nadescha Trudel, Gita Prabhu, Laurence T. Hunt, Michael Moutoussis, Raymond J. Dolan, Tobias U. Hauser
Cited by: 2
References: 102

Abstract

Biases in information gathering are common in the general population and reach pathological extremes in paralysing indecisiveness, as in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Here we adopt a new perspective on information gathering and demonstrate an information integration bias whereby there is over-weighting of most recent information via evidence strength updates (ΔES). In a crowd-sourced sample (N = 5,237), we find that a reduced ΔES weighting drives indecisiveness along an obsessive-compulsive spectrum. We replicate this attenuated ΔES weighting in a second lab-based study (N = 105) that includes a transdiagnostic obsessive-compulsive spectrum encompassing OCD and generalized anxiety patients. Using magnetoencephalography (MEG), we trace ΔES signals to a late neural signal peaking at ~920 ms. Critically, highly obsessive-compulsive participants, across diagnoses, show an attenuated neural ΔES signal in mediofrontal areas, while other decision-relevant processes remain intact. Our findings establish biased information weighting as a driver of information gathering, where attenuated ΔES is linked to indecisiveness across an obsessive-compulsive spectrum.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders Anxiety Depression Psychometrics Treatment Cognitive Processes Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Publication details

Journal / source
Nature Human Behaviour
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
727–740
Publication date
21 January 2026
Language
EN