Reinforcement learning control of quantum error correction

Read full text
Authors: Volodymyr Sivak, Alexis Morvan, Michael Broughton, Rodrigo G. Cortiñas, Johannes Bausch, Andrew W. Senior, M. Neeley, Alec Eickbusch, Noah Shutty, Laleh Aghababaie Beni, James S. Spencer, Francisco J. Heras
+88 more Thomas Edlich, Dmitry A. Abanin, Amira Abbas, Rajeev Acharya, Georg Aigeldinger, Ross Alcaraz, Sayra Alcaraz, Trond I. Andersen, M. Ansmann, Frank Arute, Kunal Arya, Walt Askew, Nikita Astrakhantsev, Juan Atalaya, Brian Ballard, Joseph C. Bardin, Hector Bates, Andreas Bengtsson, Majid Karimi, Alexander Bilmes, Simon Bilodeau, Felix Borjans, Alexandre Bourassa, Jenna Bovaird, Dylan Bowers, L. Brill, Peter Brooks, David A. Browne, Brett Buchea, Bob B. Buckley, Tim Burger, Brian Burkett, Nicholas Bushnell, Jamal Busnaina, Anthony Cabrera, Juan Campero, Hung-Shen Chang, Silas Chen, B. Chiaro, Liang-Ying Chih, Agnetta Y. Cleland, Bryan Cochrane, Matt Cockrell, Josh Cogan, Roberto Collins, Paul Conner, Harold J. Cook, William Courtney, Alexander L. Crook, Ben Curtin, Martin Damyanov, Sayan Das, Dripto M. Debroy, Sean Demura, Paul Donohoe, Ilya Drozdov, Andrew Dunsworth, Valerie Ehimhen, Aviv Moshe Elbag, Lior Ella, Mahmoud Elzouka, David Enriquez, Catherine Erickson, Vinicius S. Ferreira, Marcos Flores-Álamo, Leslie Flores Burgos, Ebrahim Forati, Jeremiah Ford, Austin G. Fowler, Brooks Foxen, Masaya Fukami, Alan Wing Lun Fung, Lenny Fuste, Suhas Ganjam, Gonzalo Cerruela García, Christopher Garrick, Robert Gasca, Helge Gehring, Robert Geiger, Élie Genois, William Giang, Dar Gilboa, James E. Goeders, E. Gonzales, Raja Gosula, Stijn J. de Graaf, Alejandro Grajales Dau, Dietrich Graumann
Cited by: 2
References: 57

Abstract

Quantum error correction (QEC) is the primary strategy for protecting a quantum computer from the environment1,2. The prerequisite of QEC is that errors must remain sufficiently rare, which requires perpetually adapting the control parameters of the computer to the drifting environmental conditions. The current solution to this problem is to terminate the entire quantum computation for recalibration, but it is incompatible with the long runtimes of future quantum algorithms3,4. Here we address this challenge by unifying calibration with computation. We grant the QEC process5–11 a dual role: its error-detection events are not only used to correct the logical quantum state but are also repurposed as a learning signal, teaching a reinforcement learning agent12–16 to continuously steer the control parameters and stabilize the quantum system during computation. We experimentally demonstrate this framework on a Willow superconducting processor, improving the logical stability of the surface code 3.5-fold against injected drift. By synthesizing our full suite of technological advances, we achieve record performance of the surface and colour codes, with average logical error per cycle of 7.72(9) × 10−4 and 8.19(14) × 10−3, respectively. Numerical simulations of large codes with tens of thousands of control parameters confirm the scalability of our RL framework, revealing an optimization speed that is independent of system size. This work thus enables a new paradigm: a quantum computer that learns from its errors and never stops computing. By integrating reinforcement learning with quantum error correction, a quantum computer continuously self-calibrates during computation, achieving record logical error rates and enhanced resilience to drift.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture Quantum Information and Cryptography Quantum-Dot Cellular Automata

Publication details

Journal / source
Nature
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Volume
655
Issue
8124
Pages
879–884
Publication date
8 July 2026
Language
EN