Biomedical Data Manifest: A lightweight data documentation mapping to increase transparency for AI/ML

Read full text
Authors: Daniel Bottomly, Christopher G. Suciu, Benjamin A. Cordier, Nathaniel Evans, Alfonso Poire, CHRISTINA L. ZHENG, Jeffrey L. Myers, Vlad Constantin Sandulache, Trever Grant Bivona, Jack Roth, Boyi Gan, Albert C. Koong
+22 more Pankaj Singh, Michael Anthony Hollingsworth, Jixin Dong, Brian J. Druker, David W. Goodrich, Song Liu, Tao Liu, Christopher Douglas Willey, Joshi J. Alumkal, Keith Syson Chan, Phuoc Tho Tran, Chunru Lin, Erina Vlashi, Alice Soragni, Paul C. Boutros, Erik S. Knudsen, Agnieszka K. Witkiewicz, Xingxing Zang, Michael W. Deininger, Jeffrey W Tyner, Alan David Hutson, Shannon K. McWeeney
Cited by: 0
References: 18

Abstract

Biomedical machine learning (ML) models raise critical concerns about embedded assumptions influencing clinical decision-making, necessitating robust documentation frameworks for datasets that are shared via external repositories. Fairness-aware algorithm effectiveness hinges on users' prior awareness of specific issues in the data - information such as data collection methodology, provenance and quality. Current ML-focused documentation approaches impose impractical burdens on data generators and conflate data/model accountability. This is problematic for resource datasets not explicitly created for ML applications. This study addresses these gaps through a two-step process: First, we derived consensus documentation fields by mapping elements across four key templates. Second, we surveyed biomedical stakeholders across four roles (clinicians, bench scientists, data manager and computationalists) to assess field importance and relevance. This revealed important role-dependent prioritization differences, motivating the development of the Biomedical Data Manifest - a modular template employing persona-specific field presentation reducing generator burden while ensuring end-users receive role-relevant information. The Biomedical Data Manifest improves transparency for datasets deposited in public or controlled-access repositories and bias mitigation across ML applications.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Research Data Management Practices Scientific Computing and Data Management Ethics and Social Impacts of AI

Publication details

Journal / source
Scientific Data
Volume
13
Issue
1
Publication date
11 February 2026
Language
EN