Feasibility and effectiveness of distal radial access in ST-elevation myocardial infarction from a SPEEDY PCI subanalysis

Read full text
Authors: Akihiko Takahashi, Sho Torii, Yujiro Ono, Masanori Taniwaki, Mitsutoshi Oguri, Masanori Teramura, Ryuichi Kato, Shuji Otsuki, Hiroshi Suzuki, Fuminobu Yoshimachi, Hironori Ueda, Keisuke Shioji
+7 more Gaku Nakazawa, Kaoru Sakurai, Mitsuru Tsujimoto, Motosu Ando, Toshiyuki Kozai, Rie Aoyama, Yuji Ikari
Cited by: 1
References: 18

Abstract

The distal radial approach (dTRA) is increasingly recognized as a viable alternative to the conventional radial approach in coronary interventions. However, its utility in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)-where rapid revascularization is critical-remains underexplored. To evaluate the feasibility and procedural characteristics of dTRA in STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), using a prespecified subanalysis of the SPEEDY PCI study. Among 370 STEMI patients enrolled, 63 underwent PCI via dTRA and 307 via the conventional radial approach. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed using Killip class, GRACE score, and door-to-sheath time as covariates. After matching, the dTRA group had significantly shorter sheath-to-balloon (12.5 ± 11.5 vs. 19.7 ± 11.7 min, p = 0.002) and door-to-balloon times (50.2 ± 25.9 vs. 62.3 ± 19.9 min, p = 0.007). Procedural success and 30-day mortality rates were comparable between groups. dTRA appears feasible and safe for STEMI patients in high-volume centers. While shorter time metrics were observed, these may reflect institutional practices and operator experience rather than the access site alone.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics Vascular Procedures and Complications Acute Myocardial Infarction Research

Publication details

Journal / source
Scientific Reports
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Volume
16
Issue
1
Publication date
17 February 2026
Language
EN