Computational assessment of memory function in kidney transplant recipients and donors

Read full text
Authors: Thomas J. Wilschut, Tim J. Knobbe, Andrea Stocco, Holly Sue Hake, Anna M. Posthummus, Aaltje L. Ziengs, TransplantLines Investigators, Stefan P. Berger, Martin R. de Borst, Rianne M. Douwes, Michele F. Eisenga, Antonio W. Gomes-Neto
+42 more Daan Kremer, Hedderik van Rijn, Jan-Stephan F. Sanders, J. Cas Swarte, Caecilia S. E. Doorenbos, Jip Jonker, Charlotte A. te Velde-Keyzer, Isabelle J. C. Dielwart, Coby Annema, Gerard Dijkstra, Rinse K. Weersma, Frank A. J. A. Bodewes, Willem S. Lexmond, Marieke T. de Boer, Vincent Erwin de Meijer, Arjan Diepstra, Marius C. van den Heuvel, Michiel E. Erasmus, C. Tji Gan, Erik A. M. Verschuuren, Eelko Hak, Frank Klont, Bouke G. Hepkema, Daan J. Touw, Henri G. D. Leuvenink, Hubert G. M. Niesters, Coretta C. van Leer-Buter, L. Joost van Pelt, Michel J. Vos, Robert A. Pol, Adelita V. Ranchor, Marion J. Siebelink, Riemer H. J. A. Slart, Gertrude J. Nieuwenhuis-Moeke, Hans Blokzijl, Kevin Damman, Vincent Erwin de Meijer, Martin R. de Borst, Anne Marie Buunk, Jacoba Margje Spikman, Hedderik van Rijn, Stephan J. L. Bakker
Cited by: 0
References: 10

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Impaired memory function is a frequent yet understudied symptom in kidney transplant recipients. In part, this knowledge gap reflects the lack of scalable, sensitive, and low-burden tools for quantifying memory function in large clinical populations. The aim of this study is to evaluate a brief, remote memory assessment and to examine memory function and its clinical correlates in kidney transplant recipients compared with healthy controls. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we demonstrate a remote, minimally burdensome memory screener, the Seattle-Groningen Memory Assessment, which estimates a patient's speed of forgetting from paired-associate learning. Participants aged 22-86 years from a large transplant cohort completed an eight-minute online memory test. Memory performance was compared between kidney transplant recipients (n = 556) and kidney donors (n = 408). Associations with demographic, clinical, and physiological variables were examined using regression analyses. RESULTS: Here, we show that the memory score derived from an eight-minute session is a reliable and accurate measure of an individual's ability for long-term retention. Kidney transplant recipients show more forgetting than donors. Memory scores are sensitive to demographic factors, including age and education level, and are associated with self-reported sleep quality, fatigue, and health-related quality of life. On the physiological level, more forgetting in recipients is linked to higher monocyte, neutrophil, reticulocyte, and white blood cell counts, as well as lower ferritin and greater iron deficiency. CONCLUSIONS: This work highlights the potential of computational memory assessment as a minimally burdensome and reliable tool for detecting cognitive impairment in complex clinical populations. Such tools may enable scalable monitoring of cognitive health and improve the detection of subtle cognitive changes relevant for disease progression and treatment evaluation.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies Epilepsy research and treatment

Publication details

Journal / source
Communications Medicine
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Volume
6
Issue
1
Publication date
5 June 2026
Language
EN