How do authors want to use AI for review?
Abstract
A survey of researchers who compared AI-generated scientific reviews with journal-agnostic human peer review reveals that they overwhelmingly prefer using AI as a self-checking tool before submission rather than as a replacement for human reviewers. It encourages an “author-centric” model in which AI helps researchers improve their manuscripts before they are reviewed by their peers. A survey of researchers who compared AI-generated scientific reviews with journal-agnostic human peer review reveals that they overwhelmingly prefer using AI as a self-checking tool before submission rather than as a replacement for human reviewers. It encourages an “author-centric” model in which AI helps researchers improve their manuscripts before they are reviewed by their peers.
Fields of Study & Subjects
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Expert finding and Q&A systems
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Publication details
- Journal / source
- EMBO Reports
- Publisher
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1388–1392
- Publication date
- 26 February 2026
- Language
- EN